Click to Learn About Our 7-Day 7-Lesson $1 Membership Here
5 Things You MUST Know
to Improve Your English
by Dr. Jeff McQuillan,
Center for Educational Development
ESLPod.com
Download PDF of the Special Report
Introduction
Almost no one who studies a second language gets very far.
Millions of high school and college students show up (attend; go to) to their English classes in the hopes of learning to communicate in a second language, but most of them will fail, and fail badly.
A few years out of school, and most have forgotten the little they learned in class.
Millions of adults who need to know English for their work, their school, or their travels pay good (a lot of) money for language CDs, books, and expensive software, but still don’t succeed.
None of this, sadly, is news. Language teachers have known about the failure rate in their language classes for many years now. Recent research confirms (shows us to be true) that very few people make it very far, especially on their own, in language courses.
Consider these facts:
- In one study, 99% – yes, 99%! – of the people who started studying with one of two popular language-learning software programs (Rosetta Stone® and Tell Me More) did not finish even the beginning two levels of the course. And these were people who were getting the program for free! Yet, only 1% finished.
- In a study of beginning language textbooks at a public library, it was found that most people who checked out the book didn’t get more than 17% into the course before stopping.
- More than 82% of high school students who start language classes in their first year of school (in the United States) stop studying it by the time they get to their fourth and final year.
- For college students, it is even worse: 83% of those studying in beginning language classes never finish their study in a second language.
With all this bad news, is there hope for you?
Make Way for the Fool
My sister worked for many years for a high-tech company in Silicon Valley. They had an expression in her division, and it goes like this: “A fool with a tool is still a fool.”
A fool is a stupid person, someone who is not very smart. A tool is an instrument you use to do something (like a hammer or a screwdriver). A fool with the tool – an iPod, a computer, a television, a tablet – is still a fool.
In other words, just having the tool – the technology, the gadgets, the software – does not make you a language teacher (or learner). You’re not going to change things just because you have a piece of technology in your hand if you don't understand the pedagogy – that is, how to teach what you want people to learn.
Sadly, that's precisely the point where we are right now in _____ (fill in the year you’re reading this article!) in language teaching.
A Quick Course in How We Get Better at Languages: The Five Principles
We don’t have time for a complete course in second language acquisition (the science of how we pick up languages), so I’m just going to talk about five things that every good language teaching technology, activity, or classroom must have.
These are the five principles you should look for in buying any kind of course, app, or other technology (including the 500-year-old kind called “paper books”) for improving your English.
Any course, class, textbook, or Internet program that does NOT have all five of these elements is NOT worth your valuable time:
Principle #1: Input
If linguist Noam Chomsky is correct, part of our brain is hardwired (programmed) with a capacity to learn language. We'll call this part of our brain the Language Acquisition Device (LAD). We all have an LAD, and it works without any sort of conscious effort or practice. Our only job in the process is to activate and “feed” that device, to get that device to work.
Although some people talk metaphorically about “exercising” the brain, Frank Smith reminds us that the brain is an organ, not a muscle. Like your kidney or your stomach, the brain doesn’t have to be “switched on.” You don’t have to “do” anything, per se, to get it to work.
You do need to give it something to work with, however.
The “something” that you need to feed your LAD in order to acquire languages is called input. Input is just another word for language exposure. In other words, you actually have to have some language coming into the LAD for it to do its magic – for it to acquire languages.
Now, there are a lot of disagreements about the details of second language acquisition theory, but I think this is one area in which almost everyone agrees: If there is no language input, there can be no language acquisition.
Two (and only two) kinds of input
There are two kinds of language input for most language acquirers: reading and listening. That’s it. Those are the two things you can use to get the input into your LAD. (We’ll leave aside the case of American Sign Language for now.) These two means of input – and only these two – must be present for language acquisition to occur.
Notice what is not included in this list: speaking and writing.
Speaking and writing are forms of output, and do not contribute directly to language acquisition. You can go home tonight, lock yourself in the bathroom for several hours, and speak to the mirror using all the high school French you can remember, and your French will not get any better.
The only way to improve your French is to read and listen to French.
Output does not help language acquisition directly, but it can contribute indirectly: If I speak or write to you, you are likely to reply. It’s the reply – what you say or write to me – that matters. That’s the input.
Any approach which attempts, especially at the lower levels, to “balance” input and output is bound to (will almost certainly) fail. Of course, we learn a language in part to speak and write it, but speaking and writing will not causelanguage acquisition. Only input can do that.
Obviously, then, most of what students do in a good language learning environment is read and listen – not play “games” about language, not manipulate the language through exercises for “practice,” not fill out worksheets or their high-tech equivalents. (Of course this doesn’t mean that they should have fun, as we’ll see in a minute.)
Principle #2: Comprehensible Input
Not just any kind of input will work for language acquisition, however. The two kinds of input (listening and reading) have to be understandable – have to be what we refer to in the applied linguistics field as comprehensible.
In order for your Language Acquisition Device to process the input, your brain must understand the message being communicated to you.
If you get a lot of language input and you do not understand it, it's just noise. It doesn't help the LAD. It doesn't further language acquisition.
So, if you go home tonight and you watch ten hours of Chinese television and you don't already know some Chinese, it is likely that you will acquire very, very little Chinese. That’s because listening to or reading incomprehensible input doesn’t help you acquire language. It’s a waste of time.
We’ll have a lot more to say in a minute on how exactly we make input comprehensible, but the important point here is that language that is too hard, too fast, or too complicated to understand does not help you acquire that language. It can only make you confused, bored, or both.
Principle #3: Sufficient Quantity of Comprehensible Input
If you are a young athlete hoping to gain weight, you have to eat, and eat a lot. It won’t help if you limit your diet to three raisins and a glass of water each day. You need a lot of “food input” to increase your weight.
The same principle applies to language acquisition. Learners need to get a lot of input in order to reach high levels of proficiency.
This seems especially to be true in vocabulary acquisition. Years of research have shown that larger vocabularies are almost always a consequence of voluminous reading (in other words, lots and lots of reading, which is to say lots and lots of input).
Unhappily, in language textbooks of the past 40 years or so, and more recently in most of the new computer programs, Internet sites, and smartphone/tablet apps, students have been given not steak and eggs, but the equivalent of three raisins a day.
It was not always this way. In the early twentieth century, many publishing companies followed the “Direct Method,” which included a massive amount of input for students, far more than almost any current language textbook.
The amount of input students now receive in a typical textbook or language learning program is a fraction of (a small percentage of) what earlier generations of students were given. (The Direct Method also got a lot of things wrong, too, so I’m not saying it is a model for language teaching today. But we can learn something from its use of large amounts of input.)
The story is more complicated than that, but basically our language learning ancestors of 100 years ago feasted (ate a lot) on an input banquet (large meal) while we eat the crumbs (very small amounts of food). Paltry (very little; inadequate) input produces paltry language acquisition.
Principle #4: Sufficient Comprehensible Input that Contains New Linguistic Elements
If you read at a second-grade reading level and you read nothing but second-grade level books for the rest of your life, you will always be a second-grade reader. You won’t get any better.
The only way to become a third-grade reader (when you read at the second-grade level) is to read something slightly above what you are reading now in terms of vocabulary and grammar.
In other words, the language input that you're being exposed to has to contain new elements that you haven't acquired yet, that are slightly above your current level of acquisition. These elements can be new grammatical structures or most anything that forms part of the language you are trying to pick up.
In applied linguistics, we call this concept of new linguistic elements in the input “i + 1,” where “i” is your current level of input and “+1” is just slightly above that level (but not so far above you that you can’t understand it).
But it is easy to take this principle too far, too fast, and that’s exactly what most language courses and apps do.
Yes, there needs to be something new in the input for you to “pick up,” or acquire, but that amount of “new” language needs to be relatively small compared to the things you already understand.
Many textbooks (and language courses) start off nice and slow, and students make good progress. Then, somewhere around Level 2 or 3, things get really hard, really fast. Student go from the equivalent of kindergarten readers to trying to understand Shakespeare.
You need to move slowly, so that you can actually understand most of what you are hearing and reading.
Principle #5: Sufficient, Compelling Comprehensible Input that Contains New Linguistic Elements.
Who wants to listen to boring lectures and read dull books? No one!
For you to be successful, you must find input (reading and listening materials) that are interesting. In fact, they should be more than just interesting – they should be compelling (really, really, really interesting!).
The reason why compelling input is important is that if it you’re not interested in the input, you’re not going to “tune into” it (pay close attention to it) and try to understand it.
Let me tell you a little story. Yesterday, I was walking down the street. After a few minutes, I saw a man behind me. He had small black object in his hand. I thought, “Is that a gun?!” So I turned around and . . .
Do you want to know what happened to the man and the gun? Are you interested in my little story? That’s what I mean about compelling input. It has to be something you really want to know about and are interested in.
(So, seriously, what about the man with the gun? I learned it was actually just an old book, but in his pocket he had a . . . okay, enough of that!)
When the input is boring, your mind will start wandering (thinking about other things), you won’t focus on what you’re listening to or reading, and then you won't actually be comprehending any language.
What’s more, you are unlikely to continue listening or reading if you get too much of that kind of input.
Remember all the people who didn’t finish their language courses? It wasn’t because the classes were TOO interesting!
Language input must be compelling, then, to keep you paying attention to the meaning of the message, and to keep you on your path to more and more input. In fact, we could say that compelling input is often more important than comprehensibility.
Think about it this way: If you are really, really interested in something, you’ll put up with a lot of “noise” (incomprehensible input) to get to the end of the story or movie or whatever it happens to be.
True story: When I was in my early twenties, I studied Spanish. One day I met a very beautiful woman from Spain by the name of Carmen. More than anything, I wanted to get Carmen’s telephone number so I could ask her out on a date.
Well, unfortunately, my Spanish was not very good, and she spoke really fast. But none of that mattered. I had a compelling interest in understanding her, especially if she decided to give me her phone number. (Unhappily for me, she left the next week back for Spain and I never got her number. But that’s not the point of the story!)
So, to review: You need five things to improve your English (or any second language). You need (1) input that is (2) comprehensible and of (3) sufficient quantity that (4) contains new linguistic elements and is (5) compelling.
The next question to answer, then, is simple:
How do we do this?
What To Do Next
Here are two things you should do to improve your English, based on what we just discussed:
(1) Read, read, read - and then read some more.
Read English that you can mostly understand (90-95% of the words). The key is “mostly."
If it is too confusing, find something easier to read. Most students aim (go for something) too high, too difficult. Think about comic books, easy teen novels, and popular fiction, not Shakespeare and Mark Twain.
(2) Join Unlimited English at ESLPod.com.
ESLPod.com's Unlimited English episodes (and our other special courses) ALL use the principle of comprehensible input. In each lesson, we explain words and their meanings. In addition, you get a written transcript of everything spoken on the audio, plus vocabulary definitions, sample sentences, and cultural notes.
There are more than 1,800 lessons available in your membership - that’s more than 400+ hours of comprehensible input!
Why not join more than 1.27 million listeners in 189 countries who have listened to the Unlimited English lessons?
And here's a SPECIAL OFFER just because you signed up for this report . . .
Seven Lessons in Seven Days for Only $1
Get Immediate Access to Your Lessons!
See if Unlimited English is right for you by getting seven of our best lessons for seven days. Here's how it works:
- Sign up for the Unlimited English 7-Day Trial here.
- After you pay $1, you will have access to your seven lessons immediately.
- You have seven days to listen to the lessons and read the Learning Guide materials.
- Stream the lessons on any computer or mobile device browser (iOS, Android, others)
- Download the lessons if you have an iPhone or iPad using our special iOS app.
- After seven days, you will NOT be charged again! If you want a "full" Unlimited English Membership, you will pay separately for that. We will not charge you without your permission!
- If you like Unlimited English, you can sign up for a full membership here where you can stream more than 1800 lessons!
Please note: Lessons are for streaming only during your 7-day trial on a computer or Android device; iPhone/iPad users can download and stream their lessons, but all lessons expire after 7 days.
Sign up for only $1 now:
OR get more information on this special offer here.
Biography
Dr. Jeff McQuillan received a Ph.D. in applied linguistics and education at the University of Southern California. He was a professor of applied linguistics at California State University, Fullerton, and Arizona State University, and has also taught courses at USC, the University of California, Los Angeles, and Loyola Marymount University.
He has given hundreds of presentations and talks to language educators in more than 30 cities across the United States. He is currently a Senior Researcher at the Center for Educational Development, the sponsor of ESLPod.com.
Copyright 2024 by the Center for Educational Development